|
|
|
INTRODUCTION |
|
Indiscriminate and injudicious use of chemical pesticides
in agriculture has resulted in several associated adverse effects such as
environmental pollution, ecological imbalances, pesticides residues in food,
fruits and vegetables, fodder, soil and water, pest resurgence, human and
animal health hazards, destruction of biocontrol agents, development of
resistance in pests etc. Therefore, Govt. of India has adopted Integrated
Pest Management (IPM) as cardinal principle and main plank of plant
protection in the overall Crop Production Programme since 1985. IPM is an
eco-friendly approach which encompasses cultural, mechanical, biological and
need based chemical control measures. The IPM approach is being disseminated
through various schemes/projects at national and state level. |
| Objectives: |
- Maximise crop production with minimum input
costs.
- Minimise environmental pollution in soil, water
and air due to pesticides.
- Minimise occupational health hazards due to
chemical pesticides.
- Preserve ecosystem and maintain ecological
equilibrium.
- No or less use of chemical pesticides for minimum
pesticide residues.
- To improve farming systems.
|
|
TOP ^ |
| Activities
|
- Popularizing IPM approach among farming
community.
- Conducting regular pest surveillance and
monitoring to assess pest/disease situation.
- Rearing biological control agents for their field
use and conservation of naturally occurring bioagents.
- Promotion of biopesticides and neem based
pesticides as alternative to chemical pesticides.
- To play a catalytic role in spread of innovative
IPM skills to extension workers, land farmers equally to resource-poor and
resource-rich states.
- Human Resource Development in IPM by imparting
training to master trainers, extension workers and farmers through farmers
field schools (FFSs) through CIPMCs, KVKs, ICAR Institutes.
- Under the HRD programme short duration courses of
two days and five days for pesticides
dealers/NGOs/Graduates/Post-graduates/Pvt. Entrepreneurs and progressive
farmers are being carried out.
- Season Long Training (SLT) programme on major
agricultural/horticultural crops.
Department.of Agriculture &
Cooperation (DAC) in the Union Ministry of Agriculture promotes the
Integrated Pest Management (IPM) approach under the scheme “Strengthening &
Modernization of Pest Management” through 31 Central Integrated Pest
Management Centres (CIPMCs) located in 28 States and one Union Territory.
The mandate of these Centres is
pest/disease monitoring, production and releases of biocontrol agents,
conservation of biocontrol agents and Human Resource Development in IPM by
imparting training to Agricultural Extension Officers and farmers at the
grassroots levels by organizing of Farmers' Field Schools (FFSs) in the
farmers’ fields. |
|
TOP ^
|
|
IPM AT A GLANCE |
|
Keeping in view ill effects of chemical pesticides such
as development of pest resistance to commonly used pesticides, pest
resurgence, outbreak of secondary pests, pesticide residues in food, fodder,
soil, air and water resulting in human health hazards and ecological
imbalances, Govt. of India, Deptt. of Agriculture & Cooperation has adopted
Integrated Pest Management (IPM) as cardinal principle and main plank of
plant protection technology in the country since 1985. The detail of which
is as under: |
| 1. |
Scheme |
STRENGTHENING & MODERNISATION OF PEST
MANAGEMENT APPROACH IN INDIA |
| |
Sub-Scheme/Component |
PROMOTION OF INTEGRATED PEST MANAGEMENT (IPM) |
| 2. |
Commencement |
1992, when Central Integrated Pest
Management Centres
(CIPMCs) were established by merging all Central
Plant
Protection Stations (CPPS), Central Surveillance Stations
(CSS)
and Central Biological Control Stations (CBCS). |
| 3. |
Mandate |
Promotion of IPM in Plant Protection under the overall
crop production programme |
| 4. |
Objectives |
-
Maximise crop production with minimum
input costs.
-
Minimise environmental pollution in
soil, water and air due
to pesticides.
-
Minimise occupational health hazards due
to
chemical pesticides.
-
Preserve ecosystem and maintain
ecological equilibrium.
-
No or less use of chemical pesticides
for minimum
pesticide residues.
-
To improve farming system.
|
| 5. |
Major Activities |
- Monitoring of
pests and diseases for forewarning
- Conservation of
natural enemies in farmer’s fields.
- Production and field releases of
biocontrol agents.
- Promotion of
ecofriendly IPM inputs like biopesticides/neem based pesticides.
- Human Resource
Development by imparting IPM training to extension officers and
farmers through FFSs/SLTPs/Short during IPM Prorgramme.
- Popularise IPM
technology among farming community.
|
| 6. |
Present Status of Central IPM Centres |
31 CIPMCs in 28 States and 1 UT |
| 7. |
Annual Target (2007-08) |
- Pest Monitoring
8.16 lakhs ha
- Field releases
of biocontrol agents 1900 million
(Augmentation
& conservation of
biocontrol agents) |
| |
IPM Trainings & Demonstrations |
- Farmers Field
Schools (Nos)
710
- Agriculture
Extension Officers to be Trained (Nos.) 3550
- Farmers to be
trained
21300
|
| 8. |
IPM Achievements
(since 1994 to March
2007)
|
- Pest Monitoring
101.17 lakh ha
- Field releases
of biocontrol agents 25,385.09 million
(Augmentation &
conservation of biocontrol agents) |
| |
IPM Trainings conducted (since 1994-2007) |
- Master Trainer’s
Training courses (Seasons Long Trainings) conducted on Various
Agricultural/Horticultural
crops
41 Nos
-
Master Trainers Trained through SLTs 1423 Nos
- Farmers’ Field
Schools organized 10562 Nos byCIPMCs/KVKs/SAUs
-
Agriculture/Horticulture Extension Officers Trained through FFSs 43,301 Nos
-
Farmers trained through FFSs 3,18,246 Nos
- Persons
(Pesticide dealers, NGOs, lead farmers, private entrepreneurs etc.)
trained under Human resource Developments Programmes (2&5 daysduration) on IPM
skills 5620
|
| 9. |
IPM Package of Practices:
Posters, Manuals &
Farmer’s Field Guides
prepared:
|
These have been
developed for the following 77 crops which includes Rice, Wheat, Maize,
Sorghum, Pearl Millet, Pigeon pea, Black gram/Green gram, Gram, Rajmah,
Pea, Groundnut, Soybean, Rapeseed/Mustard, Sesame, Safflower, Castor,
Sunflower, Potato, Onion, Tomato, Cruciferous Vegetables, Leguminous
Vegetables, Cucurbitaceious vegetables, Brinjal, Okra, Chillies, Cotton,
Sugarcane, Tobacco, Citrus, Pineapple, Sapota, Pomegranate, Grapes,
Apple, Mango, Guava, Banana, Litchi, Papaya, Apricot, Peach, Pear,
Cherry, Walnut, Ber, Amla, Small Cardamom, Large Cardamom, Black Pepper,
Coriander, Cumin, Fennel (Saunf), Ginger, Coconut, Cashew, Arecanut, Oil
Palm, Tea, Jack fruit, Spinach, Broccoli, Loquat, Strawberry, Olive,
Watermelon, Lablab bean , Garlic, Betelvine. Fig, Phalsa, Saffron,
Custard apple, Persimmon, Kiwi, Passion fruit and Raspberry
- Manual in Hindi
& English on Rice and Cotton for Subject Matter Specialists(SMS)
- Farmers field
guide in Hindi & English on Rice and Cotton.
- Handbooks on
diagnosis and Integrated Pest Management of cotton pests in English,
Hindi, Punjabi, Telugu languages.
- Folders on IPM
in Cotton in Hindi, English, Punjabi and Telugu
- Posters in Hindi
& English in Cotton and Rice for recognition of pests and natural
enemies.
|
| 10. |
Grants-in-aids to
States |
Till now, Rs. 1372.00 lakh has been released to the
States/UTs for setting up of 29 Nos. State Biocontrol
laboratories @ Rs.
50.00 lakh per laboratory under approved
outlay of 8th Five
Year Plan while an amount of Rs. 405
lakhs has been released under
approved ountly of 10th Five
year Plan for setting up of 9
State Bio-Control Laboratories
@ 45 lakhs per laboratory. Govt. of India
is also providing
grants-in-aid in the form of subsidy to NGOs for
purchase
of laboratory equipments for setting up biocontrol laboratories
@ Rs. 5 lakhs per NGO per biolab subject to the
conditions mentioned in
the guidelines prepared for
thepurpose. During 2006 approval of
Competent Authority to
11 NGOs has been released. |
| 11. |
Biocontrol Laboratories/ Units in India |
CIPMCs 31
Nos.
ICAR/SAUs/ DBT 48 Nos.
State Biocontrol Labs 98 Nos
Private Sector Labs 141
Nos.
Total 318 Nos.
|
| 12. |
External Technical Assistance |
FAO-EU Project on Cotton IPM
Duration : 5 years
(2000-2004)
Trainings
conducted
|
|
No. trained/produced |
No. trained/produced |
No. organised/trained |
|
ToF |
Facilitators |
FToF |
Facilitators |
FFS |
Farmers |
|
FAO-EU |
5 |
163 |
3 |
105 |
358 |
13836 |
|
Through States |
21 |
524 |
7 |
271 |
1098 |
21992 |
|
Grant Total |
26 |
687 |
10 |
376 * |
1456 |
35828 ** |
* of these 25 were women
** this include 5854 female farmers |
| 13. |
Registered Biopesticides |
|
Category |
Biopesticide |
|
Antagonistic
fungi & bacteria |
Trichoderma spp. |
|
Pseudomonas spp.,Gliocladium spp. |
|
Baculovirus
|
Nuclear
Polyhedrosis Virus (NPV) |
|
Bacteria |
Bacillus
thuringiensis (Bt) |
|
Plant
origin/Botanical pesticides |
Azaderechtin (Neem
based product) |
|
Cymbopogan spp. |
|
Pyrethrum sp. |
|
Entomogenous
fungi |
Beauveria
bussiana |
|
Metarhizium
an isopliae,Hirsutella spp. |
|
| 14. |
Consumption of biopesticides/Neem based pesticides (MT)
|
|
Year |
Neem |
Bt |
G. Total |
|
1994-95 |
83 |
40 |
123 |
|
1995-96 |
128 |
47 |
175 |
|
1996-97 |
186 |
33 |
219 |
|
1997-98 |
354 |
41 |
395 |
|
1998-99 |
411 |
71 |
482 |
|
1999-2000 |
739 |
135 |
874 |
|
2000-01 |
551 |
132 |
683 |
|
2001-02 |
736 |
166 |
902 |
|
2002-03 |
632 |
143 |
775 |
|
2003-04 |
824 |
157 |
981 |
|
2004-05 |
965 |
139 |
1104 |
|
2005-06 |
1717 |
203 |
1920 |
|
| 15. |
Demand and Supply
of Biocontrol Agents
(Estmiated) in
India
|
Biocontrol Agents Production Demand Area covered
Trichogramma
spp. 14,241.64
14,312.90 approximate
(in million Nos)
Trichoderma
spp.(in Kg)
4,504.00 36,100.00 {43} lakh ha.
NPV
(LE)
21,715.00 2,07,700.00
|
| 16. |
Cost of biopesticides/biocontrol agents V/s pesticide (endosulfan)
application |
|
BIOPESTICIDE/
BIO CONTROL AGENT |
BIOPESTICIDE**
COST (RS)/Ha |
PESTICIDE*
COST (RS.)/Ha |
|
B. thuringiensis
@ 1 kg/ha. |
864 |
350-500 |
|
NPV |
213 |
350-500 |
|
NEEM PRODUCTS |
500 |
350-500 |
|
LADY BIRD BEETLES |
900 |
350-500 |
|
CHRYSOPA
SPP. |
410 |
350-500 |
|
TRICHOGRAMMA
SPP.
(COTTON) |
450 |
350-500 |
|
TRICHOGRAMMA
SPP.
(SUGARCANE) |
150 |
350-500 |
*Requires repeated application resulting
in destruction of beneficial.
** Except neem products, biopesticides are
self perpetuating / reproducing agents in nature and
do not require repeated applications.
|
| 17. |
Consumption of Chemical Pesticides in India
|
|
YEAR |
QUANTITY
MT (Tech. Grade) |
|
1994-95 |
61,357 |
|
1995-96 |
61,260 |
|
1996-97 |
56,114 |
|
1997-98 |
52,239 |
|
1998-99 |
49,157 |
|
1999-00 |
46,195 |
|
2000-01 |
43,584 |
|
2001-02 |
47,020 |
|
2002-03 |
48,350 |
|
2003-04 |
41,020 |
|
2004-05 |
40,672 |
|
2005-06 |
39773 |
Sources: States/UTs
Zonal Conferences on inputs. |
|
18. |
Impact of IPM |
-
Chemical pesticide sprays
were reduced to the extent of 50-100% in rice and 29.96 to 50.5% in
cotton.
-
Use of biopesticides/neem
based pesticides increased from 123 MT during 1994-95 to 1920 MT during
2005-06.
-
Over all consumption of
chemical pesticide in the country reduced from 75033 MT (Tech. grade)
during 1990-91 to 39773 MT (T.G.) during 2005-06.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
TOP ^
|
|
COMPONENTS OF IPM |
The major
components of IPM in increasing order of complexity are as under:
-
Cultural practices.
-
Mechanical practices.
-
Genetical practices.
-
Regulatory practices.
-
Biological practices.
- Chemical practices.
|
Cultural
methods of pest control consists of regular farm operations in such a way
which either destroy the pests or prevent them from causing economic loss.
The various cultural practices have been grouped as under.
|
-
Preparation of nurseries or main fields free from pest
infestation by removing plant debris, trimming of bunds, treating of soil
and deep summer ploughing which kills various stages of pests. Proper
drainage system in field be adopted.
-
Testing of soil for nutrients deficiencies on the basis
of which fertilizers should be applied.
-
Selection of clean and certified seeds and treating
seeds with fungicide or biopesticides before sowing for seed borne disease
control.
-
Selection of seeds of relatively pest
resistant/tolerant varieties which play a significant role in pest
suppression.
-
Adjustment of time of sowing and harvesting to escape
peak season of pest attack.
-
Rotation of crops with non-host crops. It helps in
reduction of incidence of soil borne diseases.
-
Proper plant spacing which makes plants more healthy
and less susceptible to pests.
-
Optimum use of fertilizer. Use of FYM and
biofertilizers should be encouraged.
-
Proper water management (alternate wetting and drying
to avoid water stagnation) as the high moisture in soil for prolonged
period is conducive for development of pests especially soil borne
diseases.
-
Proper weed management. It is well known fact that most
of weeds besides competing with crop for micronutrients also harbour many
pests.
-
Setting up yellow pan sticky traps for white flies and
aphids at far above canopy height.
-
Synchronized sowing. Here community approach is
required to sow the crops simultaneously in vast area so that pest may not
get different staged crops suitable for its population build up and if
pest appears in damaging proportion, control operation could be applied
effectively in whole area.
-
Growing trap crops on the borders or peripheries of
fields. There are certain crops which are preferred more by a pest species
are known as trap crops for that pest. By growing such crops on the border
of the fields, pest population develop there which can be either killed by
using pesticides or its natural enemies are allowed to develop there for
natural control.
-
Root dip or seedling treatment in pest infested area.
-
Inter-cropping or multiple cropping wherever possible.
All the crops are not preferred by each pest species and certain crops act
as repellents, thus keeping the pest species away from preferred crops
resulting in reduction of pest incidence.
-
Harvesting as close as to ground level. This is because
certain developmental stages of insect pests/diseases remain on the plant
parts which act as primary inoculum for the next crop season. Hence,
harvesting crops at ground level will lessen the incidence of pests in
next season.
-
Before planting, nursery plants be sprayed/dipped in
copper fungicide/biopesticide solutions to protect the plants from soil
borne diseases.
-
While pruning fruit trees, remove
crowded/dead/broken/diseased branches and destroy them. Do not pile them
in the orchards which may act as source of pest infestation.
-
Large pruning wounds should be covered with Bordeaux
paste/paint to protect the plants from pest/disease attack.
-
For excellent fruit set, pollinizer cultivars should be
planted in required proportion in the orchards.
- Keeping bee hives or placing flower bouquets of pollinizer cultivars
facilitate better pollination and subsequent fruit set.
|
|
|
-
Removal and destruction of egg masses, larvae, pupae
and adults of insect pests and diseased parts of plants wherever possible.
-
Installation of bamboo cage cum bird perchers in the
field and placing parasitized egg masses inside them for conservation of
natural enemies and withholding of pest species wherever possible.
-
Use of light traps and destruction of trapped insects.
-
Use of rope for dislodging leaf feeding larvae e.g.
caseworm and leaf folders.
-
Installation of bird scarer in the field where
required.
-
Installation of bird perchers in the field for allowing
birds to sit and feed on insects and their immature stages viz., eggs,
larvae and pupae.
-
Use of pheromones for mating disruption and kill zone
creation.
-
Use of pheromone traps for monitoring and suppression
of pest population.
-
Use of pheromen traps fr mass traping.
|
|
|
- Selection of high
yeilding varieties for different crops
- Selection of
comparatively pest resistant/tolerant varieties
- Use of genetically
modified seeds e.g. B.t. cotton
- Release of sterile
males of insects in sufficient number in field to compete with fertile
males. Sterility in males is induced in laboratory either through
chemosterilants or through radiation.
|
In
this process regulatory rules framed by Govt. are brought into force under
which seeds and infested plant materials are not allowed to enter the
country or from one part to other parts of the country. These are known as
quarantine methods and are of two types i.e. domestic and foreign
quarantine.
|
Biological control of insect pests and diseases through biological means
is most important component of IPM. In broader sense, biocontrol is use of
living organisms to control unwanted living organisms (pests). In other
words, deliberate use of parasitoids, predators and pathogens to
maintain pest population at level blow those causing economic loss either
by introducing a new bioagent into the environment of pest or by
increasing effectiveness of those already preset in the field.
|
|
Parasitoids:
These are the organisms
which lay eggs in or on the bodies of their hosts and complete their life
cycles on host bodies as a result of which hosts die. A parasitoid may be of
different type depending on the host developmental stage in or on which it
completes its life cycle. For example, egg, larval, pupal, adult, egg-larval
and larval pupal parasitoids. Example are different species of
Trichogramma, Apanteles, Bracon, Chelonus, Brachemeria, Pseudogonotopus
etc. |
|
Predators:
These are free living
organisms which prey upon other organisms for their food. Examples are
different species of spiders, dragon flies, damsel flies, lady bird beetles,
Chrysopa species, birds etc. |
|
Pathogens:
These are micro-organisims
which infest and cause diseases in their hosts as a result of which hosts
are killed. Major groups of pathogens are fungi, viruses and bacteria. Some
nematodes also cause diseases in some insect pests. Important examples of
fungi are different species of Hirsutella, Beauveria, Nomurae and
Metarhizium which have been reported to infest and kill large number of
insects (upto 90%) in the fields. Among viruses, most important examples are
of nuclear polyhedrosis virus (NPV) and granulosis viruses. Outbreak of
viruses in armyworms, cut worms, leaf folders, hairy caterpillars and plant
hoppers have been reported many times. Among bacteria, Bacillus
thuringiensis (B.t.) and B. popillae are very common examples.
Diseases of pests can be
mass multiplied in the laboratory at a low cost in liquid or powdered
formulations that can be sprayed like ordinary chemical pesticides. These
formulations are known as biopesticides. The different types of biocontrol
practices are grouped as under:- |
-
Introduction
In
this process, a new species of bioagent is introduced into a locality for
its establishment against its host. This is done only after thorough
laboratory examination and field trials for its efficacy.
b.
Augmentation
In
this process, the population of natural enemies already present in the
area is increased by releasing either laboratory reared or field collected
bioagents of same species in such number as would require to suppress the
pest population in that area.
c.
Conservation
This
is most important component of biological control and plays a major role
in pest suppression. In this process, natural enemies present in the
nature are protected from being killed. The different practices required
to protect the natural enemies are as below.
|
-
Collection of parasitised egg masses and placing them in bamboo
cage-cum-bird perchers for allowing emergence of parasitoids and
withholding of pest larvae.
-
Educating farmers through field days, radios & TV to differentiate pests
and defenders and sparing the defenders during field sprays.
-
Chemical spray should be adopted as last resort and that too after
observing pest defender ratio and economic threshold level (ETL).
-
Use
of broad spectrum pesticides should be avoided.
-
Only selective and relatively environmental friendly (REF) pesticides
should be used where necessary.
-
As
far as possible strip or spot application of pesticides be carried out.
-
Adjustment of time of sowing and harvesting to avoid the peak season of
pest attack.
-
Growing trap crop on the borders of main fields before the actual sowing
of crop to trap pest and develop natural enemies.
-
Root dip/seedling treatment for gall midge prone area.
-
Crop rotation and inter-cropping also help in conservation of defenders.
-
Recommended dose and concentration of pesticides should be used.
|
Use
of chemical pesticides is the last resort when all other methods fail to
keep the pest population below economic loss. Although there is a great
advancement in pest management research, yet pesticides would continue to
play an important role in crop protection in view of complexity of pest
problems. Therefore, use of pesticides should be need based, judicious,
based on pest surveillance and economic threshold level (ETL) to minimise
not only the cost involved, but also to reduce associated problems. While
going for chemical control, we must understand thoroughly what to spray,
when to spray, where to spray and how to spray, keeping in mind the
following points.
-
ETL and pest defender ratio must be observed
-
Relatively safer pesticides should be selected e.g. neem based and
biopesticides.
-
If pest is present in strips or isolated patches, whole field should
net be sprayed.
Relevance of IPM practices are more important in vegetable and fruit crops
because of their unique mode of consumption by human being. Pesticides
which are generally highly toxic and are known to have toxic residual
effects could not be recommended off hand. To get more profit, farmers do
not wait until waiting periods of pesticides and harvest the crop to
market the same. This leads to pesticides poisoning, chronic effects, in
some cases even deaths. Thus, we have to be more careful and cautious in
applying pest control practices in field crops.
|
|
TOP ^
|
|