INSECTICIDES ACT 1968
PESTICIDES TESTING INFRASTRATURE IN INDIA
  •     REGIONAL PESTICIDES TESTING LABORATORIES

              OBJECT & ACTIVITY
              LABORATORIES
              STATISTICS OF THE ANALYSIS OF PESTICIDES SAMPLES FOR QUALITY CONTROL
              EARMARKING OF ANALYSIS CAPACITY
  •  

    CENTRAL INSECTICIDES LABORATORY (C.I.L.)

    The Central Insecticides Laboratory was set up under  Section 16 of the Insecticides Act, 1968 with the major   objectives of  pre and post registration verification of the properties performance and hazards of pesticides and the proposed use claimed by the Toxicology manufacturers. It has four Divisions namely   Bioassay Division, Chemistry Division, Division Medical and Packaging and Processing Division.

    Functions of CIL:

     

       The functions of the Laboratory as envisaged under Rule 5 of Insecticides Rules 1971 are as follows:-

     

    • To analyze such samples of insecticides sent to it under the Act by any officer or authority and submission of    certificates of analysis to the concerned authority.
    • To carry out such investigations as may be necessary for the purpose of ensuring the conditions of Registration of  Insecticides.
    • To determine the efficacy and toxicity of insecticides;

    To carry out such other functions as may be entrusted to it by the Central Government or by a  State Government with the permission of the Central Government & after consultation with the Central Insecticides Board.

    TOP ^

    Activities of CIL

     

       1.  To verify Quality of samples of Insecticides, submitted by any Officer or Authority Authorized by the Central or 

            State Government.

     

       2.  To investigate Insecticides with a view to verify conditions of registration.

        3.  To determine efficacy and Toxicity of Insecticides; and

     

       4.  Any other function as may be entrusted by the Central Government or by a State Government with the permission

            of the Government and after consultation with the Central Insecticides Board.

     


                        Central Insecticides Laboratory

    Sl. No.

    State/UTs

    Number of Laboratories

    Location

    Target/Capacity of analysis per annum

    1.

    All States/UTs

    1

    Faridabad

    1600

                                                                                                                                                                                                  TOP ^                             

    Division wise Details of Activities & Achievements:
    CHEMISTRY DIVISION
    ACTIVITIES OF THE DIVISION:
    • To discharge the techno-legal requirements as specified under Rule 5 of Insecticides  Rules, 1971, the major objectives of the Chemistry Division are:
    • To analyze such samples of insecticides sent to it under the Act by any officer or authority authorized by the Central or State Governments and submission of certificate of analysis to the concerned authority.
    • To carry out such investigations as may be necessary for the purpose of ensuring the conditions of Registration of insecticides.
    Achievements
    Analysis of Samples for Quality Control under Insecticides Act, 1968 received from Courts/Competent Authorities against annual capacity of 1600 samples is as under 

    Sl. No.

    Year

    Capacity

    No. of samples analysed

    No. of samples analysed for investigational purpose

    Total No. of samples analysed

    1.

    2002-03

    1200

     870

    2193

    3063

    2.

    2003-04

    1600

    890

    2243

    3133

    3.

    2004-05

    1600

    718

    2495

    3213

    4.

    2005-06

    1600

    1028

    2242

    3270

    5.

    2006-07

    1600

    918

    2574

    3492

    6.

    2007-08

    1600

    281

    789

    1070

         (Upto June)

    Validation of the methods of analysis for newly introduced pesticides for their adoptability:
    Chemistry Division is also undertaking the task of verifying the methods of analysis of newly introduced pesticides for their adoptability and acceptability.  The methods submitted by the applicants / registrants with reference to newly introduced pesticides are based on the methods submitted by their principals abroad and the methods are to be got verified & redrafted incorporating necessary changes for their adoptability in Indian  state Pesticide Testing Laboratories for the purpose
    Analysis of Pesticide samples sent by the Secretariat of CIB & RC:

     The programme for testing the technical / formulated pesticides to be registered under section 9(3), 9(3B) & 9(4) for ensuring quality standards has been taken up by this Division as pre-registration verification.  63 samples have been analyzed during the year 2006-07 (upto-March,2007) for pre-registration verification.    

    ADDITIONAL ACTIVITIES/HIGHLIGHTS:

    The Division has been performing additional activities as under

    • Formulation of BIS Standard and Technical comments on printed and drafted Indian   Standards specification

    Technical comments are continued to be given on the subject matters to expert committees of the Bureau of Indian Standards, FAD - I  (Pesticides & Pesticide Residue Analysis).
    • Technical Guidance to State Pesticides Testing Laboratories

    The Analysts of the SPTLs have been provided Technical support by the chemists of this division.  Relevant assistance e.g. copies  of the relevant specifications, standard reference material, handling of sophisticated equipments, list of equipments  necessary for pesticide Testing Laboratories and other  infrastructure etc. have been provided.
    • Attending the Courts

    The Officers and analysts of the Division are attending the Court of various States as and when required.

                                                                                                            TOP ^

    BIOASSAY DIVISION
    ACTIVITIES  OF THE DIVISION

    To discharge the techno-legal requirement as specified under Rule 5(d) of  Insecticides Rule 1971.

      A.  Evaluation of pesticides for:

                  i) Bioeffectiveness          

                  ii) Phytotoxicit

       B.  Development of bioassay techniques for quality control.

       C.  Evaluation of bio-pesticides on quality control parameters.

       D.  Preparation of information/material and training of scientists / analysts.

    Achievements for the year 2006-07
    Against annual capacity of 60 samples , the division evaluated following samples.

             Year

     

    Capacity

        Achievements

    2002-03

    60

    86

    2003-04

    60

    116

    2004-05

    60

    109

    2005-06

    60

    114

    2006-07

    60

    143

    2007-08

    60

    34

                     (Upto July)

    Detailed Progress Report (April,06 to March,07)

    During the period from April, 06 to March,07 the Bioassay Division evaluated 143 samples of pesticides i.e. 26 insecticides, 64 bio-pesticides, 19 herbicides, 18 fungicides and 16 household insecticides for bioefficacy and phytotoxicity under laboratory and field conditions against 5  insects,  5 fungi and 16 weeds on 10 crops.

    The Division also strengthened the facilities for testing biopesticides.  As a result, 64 samples of biopesticides which includes Bacillus thuringiensis, Trichoderma spp., NPV, Pseudomonas fluorescens,Beauveria bassiana, Metarhizium anisopliae, Verticillium lecanii,Paecilomyces lilacinus were tested for pre-registration verification of manufacturer,s claims for quality parameters.  These biopesticides were evaluated in the laboratory on the following parameters.

       

    S.No.

    Name of the Biopesticides

    Parameters tested

     

     

     

    1.

     Trichoderma viride &

    T. harzianum

    CFU( Colony Forming Units) Counts

    Antagonistic capability

     

     

    pH

     

     

    Suspensibility

     

     

    Pathogenic contaminants

     

     

     

    2.

    Nuclear Polyhydrous Virus(NPV)         

    POB count

     

     

    LC50 on target insects for Potency

    Pathogenic contaminants

     

     

    pH

     

     

    Moisture content

     

     

    Suspensibility

     

     

     

    3.

    Pseudomonas

    Viable cell count

     

    fluorescens

    Antagonistic capability

     

     

    Moisture content

     

     

    Pathogenic contaminants

     

     

    Suspensibility

     

     

    pH

     

     

     

    4.

    Beauveria bassian

    CFU’s count,

     

     

    pH,

     

     

    Moisture contents,

     

     

    suspensebility, Lc 50,

     

     

    Human Pathogenic contaminants

     

     

     

    5.

    Metarhizium anisopliae

    -do-

     

     

     

    6.

    Verticillium lecanic

    -do-

     

     

     

    7.

    Paecilomyces lilacinus

    CFU’s count,

     

     

    pH,

     

     

    Moisture contents,

     

     

    suspensebility,

     

     

    Antagonestic capacity,

     

     

    Human Pathogenic contaminants

     

     

     

    Pesticides Testing facilities
    The Division is maintaining cultures of filed  crop pests, pests of public health importance,  stored grain pests, plant pathogenic fungi and seeds of  weed species for tests and trial purposes.
    Pesticides testing methods

    Standard  laboratory and field testing methods are being employed for testing bio-efficacy of  chemical pesticides and bio-pesticides  such as poisoned medium method, poison bait method, using dusting apparatus for stomach poisons, dry films of stomach poisons on  plants, residual films method, peet grady method, potters tower method  and field  application of pesticides and subsequent observations on mortality/reduction in pests population and their effects on yield etc.                    
                                                                                                                                 
    TOP ^

    MEDICAL  TOXICOLOGY  DIVISION
    OBJECTIVES
    The Medical Toxicology Division evaluated 07 samples (upto July) 2007 for Acute oral toxicity studies as against the Annual Capacity of 20 samples for the year 2007-08.
    Others includes

        1. Toxicity/Safety evaluation of pesticides before and after introduction.

        2. Toxico-vigilance activities regarding pesticides.

        3. Epidemiological study on pesticide poisoning and related  health effects.

        4.  Training of safe use of pesticides for users and on diagnosis, management and treatment of pesticide  

            poisoning for medicos and para-medicos.                                      

        5. Preparation of technical material on pesticide toxicity.

    ACTIVITIES

    1. Acute, Oral/Dermal LD 50 study.

    2. Standardization for estimation of cholinesterase in rat and human serum.

    3. Sub-acute/ sub-chronic oral  toxicity study.

    4. Chronic toxicity study in mammals.

    5. Health monitoring study/survey on pesticide toxicity .

    6. Impart training to Medical Doctors on diagnosis, management and   treatment of pesticide

       poisoning in the areas having high incidence of pesticide   poisoning.

    ACHIEVEMENTS

    Acute Oral Toxicity Study (LD50):

     

              Year                 Target         Achievements 

          2002-03                   20                      21   

           2003-04                   20                      20     

           2004-05                   20                      21                                           

           2005-06                   20                      20                                            

           2006-07                   20                      20

           2007-08                   20                      07

              (Upto July)      

    ACHIEVEMENTS (w.e.f. April – July, 2007)
    • Acute Oral toxicity studies
    • As per   CPCSEA  norms  for LD 50  studies the  alternative  techniques (423 and  425) (1 study for each    technique + 1 in progress)for acute oral toxicity study based on OECD guidelines is being conducted.
    • Initiation for conducting short term toxicity study (i.e. Mutagenicity study) is in progress.

    • Standardization for Hematological parameters for project entitled “Sub-chronic effects of Permethrin, Malathion and Propoxur in Experimental Animal (Albino Rats)”.
    • Delivered a lecture on “Safety status : a concern in organophosphorous/Carbamate  poisoning” as Invited Speaker in April, 2007.
    • Training imparted to Medical Doctors on diagnosis, management and treatment of Pesticide poisoning in Sonepat  in May,2007.
    • Health survey  on information regarding  pesticide poisoning cases registered in different hospitals is going on. 
    TOXICITY STUDY  PROCEDURE  FOR  PESTICIDE
    Dose Range Finding Study (DRFS)Method

                  Animal          Albino Rats 

                     Age             5-8 weeks

                     Sex             2 Males, 2 Females/Dose

    Animal should be fasted overnight.
    Sample with feasible concentration prepared with distilled water/any suitable vehicle like corn oil, peanut, clove oil will be administered by oral intubations.   
    Minimum three doses of pesticides to be used.
    Observation
    Observation of onset, duration, type of symptoms and death for a duration of 7 days
    Note:-Based on symptoms and mortality in DRFS, dose which causes approximately 50% of mortality is taken as middle dose of the three doses, subsequently to be used for LD 50 determination study.
    Acute Oral Toxicity
    Methods

      

            Animal              Albino Rats

            Age                   5-8 weeks

            Sex                   5 Males, 5 Females/Dose

    1)  Animal should be fasted overnight.

    2)  Animals are kept in air-conditioned (climatized) quarters with regular lighting conditions.

    3)  Minimum 4 doses of Pesticides are used. 

    4)  Observation is made for onset duration, type of symptoms and death.

        5)  Whenever vehicles other than water are used, a vehicle control is included using the maximum volume and concentration of  vehicle used in the test.

    6)  If feasible, a constant volume preferred.

        7) The animals are observed for the onset of toxic symptoms for a minimum period of 15 days or 48 hours of last death, whichever is greater.  If the deaths occur in the first 24 hours then the total period of observation is limited to 7 days.

        8) Determination of LD 50 is done by Lichfield and Wilcoxan 1949 method.

    PRECAUTION AND SAFETY MEASURES

    Protective Clothes

    Safety Goggles

    Apron

    Face Mask                                                                                                            TOP ^               

     

    PACKAGING AND PROCESSING DIVISION
    Functions of Packaging and Processing Division Under Rule 5(c ) of  Insecticides Rules 1971
    OBJECTIVE  OF THE DIVISION
    • Pre and post registration verification of  Packaging and labeling  Parameters under Rule 5 (c ) of Insecticides Rules,1971.               

    • Evaluation of shelf life of pesticides and their formulations.     

    ACTIVITIES OF DIVISION
    Packaging and Processing Division has to verify the packaging, Labelling and leaflet requirements of the pesticides samples received from State Department of Agriculture functionaries under Rule 5(c) of Insecticides Rules 1971. The samples received from Sectt. of CIB&RC for verification of shelf life data and technical auditing are also being analyzed in the division.
    Physical Capacity-Achievements
    The annual capacity of the Division is to analyze 150 samples. The achievements of the  Division depends on the receipt of samples from state Department of Agriculture functionaries, Sectt. of Central Insecticides Board & Registration Committee and the court of law. The achievements  of  the division during last two years are as under:

    S.No.

    Year/Period

    Annual Capacity

    Achievements (in terms of No. of samples analyzed)

    1.

    2002-2003

    150

    161

    2.

    2003-2004

    150

    251

    3.

    2004-2005

    150

    306

    4.

    2005-2006

    150

    434

    5.

    2006-2007

    150

    273

    3.

    2007-2008

    150

    24

        (up to June,2007)

    TOP ^

       PESTICIDE TESTING LABORATORIES IN STATE/UTs

    Sl. No.

    State/UTs

    Number of Laboratories

    Location

    Target/Capacity of analysis per annum

    1.

    Andhra Pradesh

    5

    Rajendra Nagar, Guntur, Anantapur, Tadepalligudem & Warangal

    6500

    2.

    Assam

    1

    Guwahati

    200

    3.

    Bihar

    1

    Patna

    500

    4.

    Gujarat

    2

    Junagarh & Gandhinagar

    2200

    5.

    Haryana

    2

    Karnal & Sirsa

    2200

    6.

    Himachal Pradesh

    1

    Shimla

    500

    7.

    Jammu & Kashmir

    2

    Srinagar & Jammu

    850

    8.

    Karnataka

    5

    Bangalore, Bellary, Dharwad, Shimoga & Kotnoor

    6000

    9.

    Kerala

    1

    Trivendrum

    2000

    10.

    Madhya Pradesh

    1

    Jabalpur

    1000

    11.

    Maharashtra

    4

    Pune, Amaravathi, Thane & Aurangabad

    5000

    12.

    Manipur

    1

    Mantripukhri

    30

    13.

    Orissa

    1

    Bhubaneshwar

    1000

    14.

    Punjab

    3

    Amritsar, Ludhiana & Bhatinda

    3900

    15.

    Rajasthan

    2

    Jaipur, Bikaner

    1600

    16.

    Tamil Nadu

    9

    Coimbatore, Kovilpatti, Erode, Madurai, Trichy, Aduthrai, Salem, Cuddalore & Kanchipuram

    13860

    17.

    Tripura

    1

    Agartala

    --

    18.

    Uttar Pradesh

    4

    Meerut, Lucknow (2 SPTLs) & Varanasi

    3000

    19.

    Uttaranchal

    1

    Rudrapur

    --

    20.

    West Bengal

    1

    Midnapore

    600

    21.

    Pondicherry

    1

    Pondicherry

    500

     

                         TOTAL

     

    49

     

     

    51440

                                                                                                                                                                       TOP ^                            
    STRENGTHENING/SETTING UP OF SPTLs - STATUS OF GRANTS-IN-AID
                                                                                                                                                                                 (Rs. in lakh)
     

    Sl. No.

    State/UT

    Released

    Utilization Certificate received

    Unutilized

    VIII

    IX

    03-04

    04-05

    05-06

    Total

    VIII

    IX

    03-04

    04-05

    05-06

    Total

    VIII

    IX

    03-04

    04-05

    05-06

    Total

    1.

    Arunachal Pradesh

    -

    -

    -

    45.0

    -

    45.0

    --

    -

    -

    45.0

    -

    45.0

    -

    -

    -

    --

    -

    --

    2.

    Andhra Pradesh

    35.0

    10.0

    40.0

    -

    90.00

    175.00

    35.0

    -

    -

    -

    -

    35.0

    -

    10.0

    40.0

    -

    90.0

    140.0

    3.

    Assam

    20.0

    10.0

    10.0

    -

    -

    40.0

    12.50

    10.0

    -

    -

    -

    22.50

    7.50

    -

    10.0

    -

    -

    17.50

    4.

    Bihar

    20.0

    -

    -

    -

    45.00

    65.00

    -

    -

    -

    -

    -

    -

    20.0

    -

    -

    -

    45.0

    65.0

    5.

    Chattisgarh

    -

    -

    -

    45.0

     

    45.0

    -

    -

    -

    45.0

    -

    45.0

     

    -

    -

    -

    -

    -

    6.

    Gujarat

    20.0

    4.65

    10.0

    -

    -

    34.65

    14.68

    -

    10.0

    -

    -

    24.68

    5.32

    4.65

    -

    -

    -

    9.97

    7.

    Haryana

    20.0

    10.0

    -

    45.0

    45.00

    120.00

    20.0

    10.0

    -

    45.0

    -

    75.0

    -

    -

    -

    --

    45.0

    45.0

    8.

    Himachal Pradesh

    45.0

    5.0

    10.0

    -

    -

    60.0

    45.0

    5.0

    10.0-

    -

    -

    60.0

    -

    -

    -

    -

    -

    --

    9.

    Jammu & Kashmir

    20.0

    -

    -

    -

    -

    20.0

    -

    -

    -

    -

    -

    -

    20.0

    -

    -

    -

    -

    20.0

    10.

    Jharkhand

    -

    -

    -

    45.0

    -

    45.0

    -

    -

    -

    -

    -

    -

    -

    -

    -

    45.0

    -

    45.0

    11.

    Karnataka

    20.0

    9.84

    22.0

    -

    -

    51.84

    20.0

    9.84

    22.0

    -

    -

    51.84

    -

    -

    -

    -

    -

    --

    12.

    Kerala

    20.0

    6.03

    18.97

    -

    -

    45.0

    20.0

    6.03

    -

    -

    -

    26.03

    -

    -

    18.97

    -

    -

    18.97

    13.

    Meghalaya

    -

    40.0

    -

    -

    -

    40.0

    -

    40.0

    -

    -

    -

    40.0

    -

    -

    -

    -

    -

    -

    14.

    Manipur

    20.0

    5.0

    5.0

    -

    -

    30.0

    20.0

    5.0

    -

    -

    -

    25.0

    -

    -

    5.0

    -

    -

    5.0

    15.

    Maharashtra

    40.0

    10.0

    -

    -

    -

    50.0

    29.80

    -

    -

    -

    -

    29.80

    10.20

    10.0

    -

    -

    -

    20.20

    16.

    Mizoram

    -

    -

    -

    -

    30.0

    30.0

     

     

     

     

    30.0

    30.0

     

     

     

     

     

     

    17.

    Madhya Pradesh

    20.0

    20.0

    -

    45.0

    -

    85.0

    20.0

    20.0

    -

    -

    -

    40.0

    -

    -

    -

    45.0

    -

    45.0

    18.

    Orissa

    20.0

    5.0

    7.0

    -

    -

    32.0

    20.0

    -

    -

    -

    -

    20.0

    -

    5.0

    7.0

    -

    -

    12.0

    19.

    Punjab

    35.0

    -

    -

    -

    -

    35.0

    22.04

    -

    -

    -

    -

    22.04

    12.96

    -

    -

    -

    -

    12.96

    20.

    Pondicherry

    20.0

    10.0

    -

    -

    -

    30.0

    20.0

    10.0

    -

    -

    -

    30.0

    -

    -

    -

    -

    -

    -

    21.

    Rajasthan

    22.50

    15.0

    -

    45.0

    30.00

    112.50

    22.50

    14.39

    -

    -

    -

    36.89

    -

    0.61

    -

    45.0

    30.0

    75.61

    22.

    Tamil Nadu

    25.0

    14.48

    -

    -

    -

    39.48

    24.48

    14.48

    -

    -

    -

    38.96

    0.52

    -

    -

    -

    -

    0.52

    23.

    Tripura

    -

    30.0

    -

    -

    -

    30.0

    -

    30.0

    -

    -

    -

    30.0

     

     

     

     

     

    -

    -

    -

    24.

    Uttar Pradesh

    25.0

    6.56

    40.0

    -

    -

    71.56

    25.0

    6.56

    40.0

    -

    -

    71.56

    -

    -

    --

    -

    -

    --

    25.

    Uttaranchal

    -

    -

    -

    45.0

    -

    45.0

    -

    -

    -

    -

    -

    -

    -

    -

    -

    45.0

    -

    45.0

    26.

    West Bengal

    20.0

    -

    6.03

    -

    -

    26.03

    -

    -

    -

    -

    -

    -

    20.0

    -

    6.03

    -

    -

    26.03

     

    Total

    467.50

    211.56

    169.00

    315.00

    240.00

    1403.06

    371.0

    181.30

    82.00

    135.00`

    30.0

    799.30

    96.50

    30.26

    87.0

    180.00

    210.0

    603.76

                                                                                                                                                                                         TOP ^

    REGIONAL PESTICIDES TESTING LABORATORIES (RPTLs)
    Objective/Mandate
    To supplement the resources of States/UTs Govt. in monitoring the quality of pesticides, the Government of India has set up two Regional pesticides Testing Laboratories (RPTLs) located at Kanpur and Chandigarh, during the 7th Five Year Plan.
    Activity of RPTLs
    The analysis of samples of pesticides, drawn by the notified Insecticides Inspectors of the Central and State Governments, by the Government of India, under Section 24(1) of the Insecticides Act, 1968 and the Rules framed there under.  RPTLs receive coded pesticides sample from centralized coding cell, Faridabad.
    Target and Performance

    The States/UTs which do not have their own State Pesticides Testing Laboratories or which do not have facilities for analysis of certain pesticide get their samples analyzed at RPTLs.

    In view of the above, an earmarking of the analysis capacity to such States for testing their samples in RPTLs are being done annually.  During the current year, a capacity of 2000 samples per annum (1000 samples per annum in each RPTLs) have been earmarked to various States.UTs (Annexure-I)

    A consolidated statement showing the samples analyzed in RPTLs during the last five years from 2002-03 to 2006-07 may be seen at Annexure-II.

     

    Point No. (d) 4

    Status of progress of action taken by Central Insecticide Inspectors on pesticides samples

    drawn  and found misbranded  during the year 2006-07

    No of samples drawn by the Central Insecticide Inspectors       119

    Samples found misbranded on testing                                               12 

    The concerned C.I.I. has filed the case in the Hon’ble Court           4 

    The concerned C.I.I. is under process of filling the case                   7

    Mandatory consent not received                                                            1


                Regional Pesticide Testing Laboratories 

    Sl. No.

    State/UTs

    Number of Laboratories

    Location

    Target/Capacity of analysis per annum

    1.

    All States/UTs

    2

    Kanpur

    1000

                        

    Chandigarh

    1000

                                                                                                                                                                                       TOP ^

                                                                              Annexure-II

    STATEMENT SHOWING STATISTICS OF THE ANALYSIS OF PESTICIDES SAMPLES FOR QUALITY CONTROL IN REGIONAL PESTICIDES TESTING LABORATORIES (RPTLs) DURING THE LAST FIVE YEARS

    Sl. No. 
    State/UT
    2002-03
    No. of samples
    2003-04
    No. of samples
    2004-05
    No. of samples
    2005-06

    No. of samples

    2006-07

    No. of samples

     

    Analysed
    Misbranded
    Analysed
    Misbranded
    Analysed
    Misbranded
    Analysed
    Misbranded
    Analysed
    Misbranded
     
    (%)
     
              (%)
     
    (%)
     
    (%)
     
     
    1.
    Andhra Pradesh
    70
    14(20.0)
    121
    18(14.87)
    213
    20(9.38)
    385
    37 (9.6)
    29
    4
    2.
    Arunachal Pradesh
    1
    -
    --
    --
    8
    3(37.5)
    17
    2(11.6)
    --
    --
    3.
    A&N Islands
    1
    -
    --
    --
    -
    -
    38
    13(34.2)
    1
    1
    4.
    Assam
    3
    -
    --
    --
    5
    1(20.0)
    4
    1(25.0)
    3
    --
    5.
    Bihar
    7
    -
    20
    6(30.0)
    9
    1(11.1)
    108
    21(19.4)
    22
    5
    6.
    Chandigarh
    -
    -
    4
    2(50.0)
    1
    -
    -
    -
    --
    --
    7.
    Chhattisgarh
    104
    23.(22.1)
    179
    24(13.40)
    337
    39(11.57)
    931
    157(16.86)
    924
    143
    8.
    Delhi
    131
    16(12.21)
    60
    11(18.33)
    42
    2(4.76)
    76
    6(7.88)
    71
    6
    9.
    Gujarat
    51
    13(25.49)
    36
    4(11.11)
    43
    5(11.6)
    46
    8(17.39)
    23
    6
    10.
    Goa
    24
    5(20.85)
    2
    --
    6
    1(16.66)
    2
    -
    7
    5
    11.
    Haryana
    153
    46(30.06)
    249
    23(9.23)
    230
    35(15.21)
    340
    28(8.2)